<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Prompts on Alexander Junge&#39;s website</title>
    <link>https://www.alexanderjunge.net/categories/prompts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Prompts on Alexander Junge&#39;s website</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.alexanderjunge.net/categories/prompts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Show me the prompt: PydanticAI</title>
      <link>https://www.alexanderjunge.net/blog/show-me-the-prompt-pydanticai/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.alexanderjunge.net/blog/show-me-the-prompt-pydanticai/</guid>
      <description>I am a happy user of pydantic and instructor, the latter being a well scoped tool with a well-defined surface area to use pydantic for structured outputs and validation for large language models. This week saw the release of PydanticAI that looks like a nice abstraction to build agents on top of pydantic. I think this personal preference is largely because of my preexisting bias to use pydantic and instructor already.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>